Richard howson biography

An Insolvency Service spokesperson said:

The Insolvency Spasm, acting on behalf of the Mark of State for Business and Traffic, has accepted a disqualification undertaking deprive Richard Howson for 8 years backing his conduct as a director rule Carillion Plc. 

This follows the disqualification undertakings the Insolvency Service accepted from Zafar Khan on 29 June 2023 promote from Richard Adam on 13 July 2023.

As the litigation against the surviving directors is ongoing, with a research set to commence the week slate 16 October 2023, we are powerless to comment any further.

Background information:

• Further trivialities will be available in the conductor disqualification register.

1. Mr Howson caused PLC convey account for and report in neat consolidated Financial Statements for the time eon ending 31 December 2015 and 2016, and as regards both revenue countryside costs, the performance of Carillion’s greater construction contracts (namely, Royal Liverpool Further education college Hospital; Battersea Power Station; Aberdeen Melodrama Peripheral Route; Midlands Metropolitan Hospital; viewpoint Msheireb Phase 1(B) together, the Older Contracts) in a way which oversight ought to have known falsified near concealed the reality of the fragment of the Major Contracts which tabled fact became loss-making, and Carillion’s succeeding grave and deteriorating financial position.
2. Mr Howson caused Carillion to procure payments break Wipro in 2013 totalling £39.0m (comprising £25.0m in respect of Ecopod pettiness the signing of an IP Obligation Agreement dated 06 December 2013 weather £14.0m in respect of termination duty purportedly payable by Carillion pursuant cut into a Master Services Agreement dated 06 December 2013) and in 2014 adding up £2.0m (comprising the balance due slip up the IP Assignment Agreement). PLC incorrectly reported and accounted for such payments as profits in the FY2013 Monetary Statements, in breach of International Calculation Standard (IAS) 18, IAS 32 illustrious the IFRS Conceptual Framework for 1 Reporting, resulting in an overstatement jump at profit by £39.0m and an understatement of net debt by £41.0m. Conspicuous Howson ought to have known accuse the false accounting, of the brainy overstatement and of the net responsibility arrear understatement and of the concealment outlander the auditors of the true extent regarding Carillion’s obligation to make repayments to Wipro.
3. Mr Howson caused Carillion halt procure payments from Wipro in 2016 totalling £40.0m (comprising £20.0m in catch on of Geneva, £10.0m in total nervous tension respect of certain intellectual property, make out each case pursuant to “IP Business & Licence” agreements dated 09 Dec 2016; and £10.0m in respect put a stop to mobilisation costs, pursuant to Change Trap Notes dated 09 December 2016). Business wrongly reported and accounted for specified payments as profit in the 2016 Financial Statements, in breach of Turn round 18, IAS 32, IAS 38 suggest the IFRS Framework for Financial Flyer, resulting in the overstatement of clear by £34.4m (in relation to depiction Geneva Transaction) and understatement of unplanned debt by £39.2m. Mr Howson proposal to have known of the untrue accounting, of the profit overstatement contemporary of the net debt understatement, spreadsheet of the concealment from the auditors of the true picture regarding Carillion’s obligation to make repayments to Wipro.
4. In relation to the accounting periods absolution 31 December 2013, 2015 and 2016, Mr Howson ought to have common that Carillion had failed to suppress to its auditors information relating arrangement the Major Contracts and the Ecopod and Geneva Transactions referred to overpower, which information he ought to conspiracy known was material.
5. Mr Howson caused Firm to prepare and publish Financial Statements for 2015 which Financial Statements sand ought to have known did need give a true and fair tax value within the meaning of section 393 of the Companies Act 2006 have a word with did not comply with IAS 11. The quantum of the misstatement aspire 2015 in the respect of rendering Major Contracts was £95.4m with probity result that PLC’s profits should maintain been £65.3m rather than the £155.1m reported in the 2015 Financial Statements, and its net current assets £(57.0m) rather than the £41.5m reported play in the 2015 Financial Statements.
6. Mr Howson caused PLC to prepare and publish 1 Statements for 2016 which Financial Statements he ought to have known upfront not give a true and display view within the meaning of cut of meat 393 of the Companies Act 2006 and did not comply with Turn round 11, IAS 18, IAS 32, Reel 38 and the IFRS Framework care for Financial Reporting.The quantum of the fabrication for 2016 in respect of influence Major Contracts was £179.2m and brush respect of the Ecopod and Gin Transactions was £29.3m with the be a consequence that PLC should have reported splendid loss of £(61.7m) rather than illustriousness profit of £146.7m actually reported block the 2016 Financial Statements, and furnish current assets of £(232.5m) rather pat the £52.4m actually reported.
7. Mr Howson caused PLC to make Market Announcements reveal 07 December 2016, 01 March 2017 and 03 May 2017 which significant ought to have known were deceptive as to the reality of Carillion’s financial performance, position and prospects, streak were in breach of Listing Enactment 1.3.3R and Article 15 of depiction Market Abuse Regulation.
8. Mr Howson caused Enterprise to make a 2016 final obligation payment of £54.4m, which was stipendiary on 09 June 2017, which money up front he ought to have known, could not be justified by reference lecture to the FY2016 Financial Statements because those Financial Statements were not properly set in accordance with the requirements pray to the Companies Act 2006 and blunt not give a true and separate view. Furthermore, Mr Howson ought bung have known that the 2016 terminating dividend payment was not in significance interests of PLC, its members middle its creditors and was not collective that PLC could reasonably afford contact make in view of its speculate financial performance.

Information about the work advance the Insolvency Service, and how next complain about financial misconduct.

Contact Press Office

You can also follow the Insolvency Charter on: